Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital and King Fahad Medical City (KFMC) Dr. Sulaiman A

Posted: January 23rd, 2023

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital and King Fahad Medical City (KFMC)
Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital in Khobar is a private healthcare facility, while King Fahad Medical City (KFMC) is a public healthcare facility in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Both facilities provide medical services to the local population, but the two have several important differences and similarities.
One of the main differences between private and public healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia is the funding and ownership structure. Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital is a private facility, which means it is owned and operated by a private entity, typically a corporation or an individual (Al Saffer et al., 2021). In contrast, KFMC is a public healthcare facility, meaning it is owned and operated by the government. This difference in ownership and funding structure can lead to differences in the types of services offered, the quality of care provided, and the cost of services.
Another key difference between the two facilities is their level of autonomy. Private healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia, such as Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, typically have more autonomy than public facilities like KFMC (Al Saffer et al., 2021). Furthermore, this means they have more freedom to decide how to operate the facility, what services to offer, and how to manage their resources. Public facilities are more tightly regulated and have less autonomy. Moreover, this can lead to differences in how services are provided and the facilities’ efficiency level.
Despite the differences, some similarities exist between private and public healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia. Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital and KFMC are subject to the same laws and regulations regarding healthcare in the Kingdom. Moreover, they must also adhere to the same standards of quality and patient safety. Additionally, both types of facilities have the same ultimate goal: to provide the best possible care to patients.
In terms of the laws that impact how these two facilities operate, the main regulation is the National Health Regulation and Accreditation (NHRA), which was established in 2007; its main role is to regulate and accredit healthcare facilities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, both private and public facilities are subject to its regulations (Alshahrani et al., 2019). The NHRA sets standards for the quality of care provided by healthcare facilities and conducts regular inspections to ensure these standards are met. Any facilities that fail to meet these standards can face penalties, including revoking their license.
In conclusion, private and public healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia have many differences and similarities. While private facilities have more autonomy and may offer different services than public facilities, both facilities are subject to the same laws and regulations. They are required to provide high-quality care to patients.
References
Al Saffer, Q., Al-Ghaith, T., Alshehri, A., Al-Mohammed, R., Al Homidi, S., Hamza, M. M. … & Alazemi, N. (2021). The capacity of primary health care facilities in Saudi Arabia: infrastructure, services, drug availability, and human resources. BMC health services research, 21(1), 1–15.
Alshahrani, A., Stewart, D., & MacLure, K. (2019). A systematic review of the adoption and acceptance of eHealth in Saudi Arabia: Views of multiple stakeholders. International journal of medical informatics, pp. 128, 7–17.

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now