In your thinking about Serrano’s article, what do you think of “the paradox of tolerance” (434)?

Posted: February 3rd, 2023

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Directions for Paper Option #3 on Analyzing Logos (Logic and Common Fallacies of Logic) in Serano (pages 432-435) or Bok (pages 437-438): For this 500-750 word paper, analyze the soundness of the logic in either (or both) Julia Serano, “(Un)safe Spaces: Can We Tolerate Intolerant Speech on Campus?” or Derek Bok, “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus.” With specific focus on the inconsistencies or contradictions in the logic of either Bok or Serano, consider how well Serano’s or Bok’s arguments use logic to develop their stance on free speech. To brainstorm on one or both of the essays, consider these questions: In your thinking about Serrano’s article, what do you think of “the paradox of tolerance” (434)? Do you accept the logic behind this paradox? Or, does this paradox make Serrano’s argument contradictory and unsound? In your thinking about Bok’s essay, consider that his free speech argument is based on the premise that curtailing speech “simply prevents students from being ‘offended’” (439). What might be problematic about this premise? Does Bok’s

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now