Posted: January 12th, 2023
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now
CO1: Evaluate self-driving technology to forecast the applicability to improve supply chain management.
CO2: Explain the ramifications of the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) technology in supply chain management.
Research unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), also known as drones, and consider the applications of these devices for the support of different supply chains. Consider the implications of UAVs for business to business (b2b) and business to customer (b2c) transactions. Focus on one aspect of the usefulness of UAV technology and explain where it should be applied first. Discuss the pros and cons of the deployment of UAV technology in your chosen application.
Label your Word document as follows: yourlastname.docx (ex: Johnson.docx)
Essay format; not bullet format
Minimum 4 full pages of content (Word document) of strategic material (does not include cover page, abstract, nor reference pages)
All charts, graphs, pictures are to go in the appendix (not a substitute for content)
Resources and citations are formatted according to APA (6th edition) style and formatting
Refrain from excessive use of quotes in your response (less than 5%)
Jan 15, 2023 11:59 PM
Rubric Name: SCMG501/502/503 Assignment Rubric
Did Not Attempt
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Did not attempt.
Score of Focus/Thesis,
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment.
Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Did not attempt.
Score of Content/Subject Knowledge,
Critical Thinking Skills
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for 500-600 level work.
Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.
Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements.
Assignment demonstrates the student’s above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.
Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment.
However, student presents a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.
Student demonstrates beginning understanding of key concepts, but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills.
Did not attempt.
Score of Critical Thinking Skills,
Organization of Ideas and Format
Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion.
Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence.
Student uses at least of 5-7 references in assignment.
Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment.
Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with a few formatting errors. Assignment contains less than 5 resources.
Learner applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing. Student uses less than 3 sources or references.
Assignment reveals formatting errors and a lack of organization.
Student presents an incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key terms. The lack of appropriate references or source materials demonstrates the student’s need for additional help or training in this area. Student needs to review and revise the assignment.
Did not attempt.
Score of Organization of Ideas and Format,
Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. Presents a thorough, extensive understanding of word usage. Student excels in the selection and development of a well- planned research assignment.
Assignment is error-free and reflects student’s ability to prepare a high-quality academic assignment.
Student provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select appropriate word usage and present an above average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3-5 errors. Student provides a final written product that covers the above-minimal requirements.
Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but more than 5 errors. Key terms and concepts are somewhat vague and not completely explained by student. Student uses a basic vocabulary in assignment.
Student’s writing ability is average, but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter.
Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments.
Student’s writing style is weak and needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness.
Student needs to review and revise assignment.
Did not attempt.
Score of Writing Conventions,
Student provides sophisticated synthesis of complex body of information in the preparation of assignment. Research provided by student contributes significantly to the development of the overall thesis.
Student incorporates at least of 7-10 quality references in assignment. Student incorporates a variety of research resources and methodology in the preparation of assignment.
Student achieves an above average synthesis of research, but interpretation is narrow in scope and description within assignment.
Assignment contains less than 7 resources, and presents an average overview of key concepts.
Assignment provides a basic, but borderline perspective of student’s research abilities. Student has incorporated less than 4 sources, which does not attempt to cover key elements of assignment.
Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for assignment. The lack of appropriate references or source materials demonstrates the student’s need for additional help or training in this area. Student needs to review and revise the assignment. The paper is not of acceptable quality for graduate-level work.
Did not attempt.
Score of Research Skills,
TotalScore of SCMG501/502/503 Assignment Rubric,
/ 100Overall Score
Exemplary90 points minimum
Accomplished80 points minimum
Developing70 points minimum
Beginning60 points minimum
Did Not Attempt0 points minimum
Files to submit
(0) file(s) to submit
After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.Add a FileRecord AudioRecord Video
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.