Outline Template IntroductionPhysician assisted suicide or Euthanasia is when a

Posted: November 27th, 2022

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Outline Template
IntroductionPhysician assisted suicide or Euthanasia is when a person with a terminal illness chooses lethal medication to end their life
.
Body Paragraph 1 – Technical aspects of your topic Topic Sentence: Doctor-aided suicide or euthanasia is among the most discussed topics worldwide, particularly in Europe and North America. These issues will explore acceptance of PSA and its regulations when dealing with decisions about the end of life.Supporting detail 1: patient autonomy
Supporting detail 2 relieves patient suffering
Supporting detail 3 allows the patient to choose how their life will end.

Body Paragraph 2 – Description of public policy debates surrounding your topicParagraph Transition euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide argue that in some circumstances living is worse than dying
Topic Sentence: However, legalizing euthanasia/ PSA provides relief to patients suffering from terminal illnessesSupporting detail 1 Patients should have the right to decide what is best for themselves including physician assisted suicide when the pain is unending
Supporting detail 2 patients have the right to refuse medication, they should be allowed to request for medical interventions that are capable of directly causing death
Supporting detail 3 Medical professionals should be open to assisting their patients with physician assisted suicide

Body Paragraph 3 – Supporting ArgumentsParagraph Transition therefore legalizing PSA or euthanasia will provide patients with a sense of relief knowing they can end the suffering when they are ready
Topic Sentence:Supporting detail 1 legalization of euthanasia explain that administering euthanasia provides relief to patients suffering from terminal illnesses
Supporting detail 2 framework and foundation of medicine is its role in relieving pain and helping sick people
Supporting detail 3 that providing relief for suffering patients via lethal ingestion is compassionate and humane

Body Paragraph 4 – Arguments AgainstParagraph Transition: most doctors are against this act terming is unethical and morally wrong.
Topic Sentence: Nonetheless many physicians have stated it is unethical as it goes against the Hippocratic principlesSupporting detail 1 the killing act is wrong and unethical

Supporting detail 2 losing autonomy.
Supporting detail 3 goes against religious values and beliefs
Opinion and ConclusionTransition: Many debates on physician assisted suicide continues even in the modern world
Statement of Opinion: Physician-assisted suicide is painless and fast. Upholds duty of care associated with the medical field maintaining respect for autonomy and helping with relieving pain.

References – In APA format (References on separate page)Include at least three outside references and cite within your outline
Braverman, Derek W., et al. “Health care professionals’ attitudes about physician-assisted death: an analysis of their justifications and the roles of terminology and patient competency.”Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Kim, Scott YH. “Lives not worth living in modern euthanasia regimes.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
This week you will submit the final draft of your term paper. Your term paper should:
Discuss the technical aspects of your topic in general terms.
Discuss the public policy debates relevant to the topic you choose. This section should cover arguments that favor and oppose the use of the techniques or products.
Express your personal opinion regarding the topic’s importance and the validity of the pro and con arguments.
Your submission must include:
A title page
The body of the paper, which includes 4–6 content pages of a professionally written text
At least three references from textbooks, websites, and articles that provide adequate justification and support your claim
Subheadings (technical aspects, public policy, and personal opinion/conclusion)
Appropriate in-text citations throughout the paper
A reference list with only the sources used in the body of the paper (All sources should be less than five years old unless recent research is not available, and at least one reference must be a peer-reviewed article from a professional journal. Do not use Wikipedia or an encyclopedia as they are not considered reliable academic sources and will not be accepted.)
APA style formatting throughout your paper
Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Points: 100
Rubric
Signature Assignment Final Paper
Signature Assignment Final Paper
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
50 to >39.5 ptsMeets Expectations
Paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts.Paper includes several high quality, thought- provoking ideas.Topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment.
39.5 to >29.5 ptsApproaches Expectations
Paper does not demonstrate that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts.Paper includes few, if any, thought-provoking ideas or unique insights to the discussion.Topic is not focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment.
29.5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The paper indicates no understanding of the concepts in the course.The paper lacks any exploration of the subject by the author.The topic is unclear or too broad for the scope of the assignment.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization/
Cohesiveness
20 to >15.8 ptsMeets Expectations
Connections among subtopics and the thesis/topic are clear without being repetitive or redundant. Concluding remarks demonstrate analysis and synthesis of ideas.Writing and integration of source materials is eloquent and skillful.
15.8 to >11.8 ptsApproaches Expectations
Connections among subtopics are missing or forced.Conclusion is unclear or disconnected from the topic.Writing and integration of source materials is awkward or confusing.
11.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Connections among subtopics are missing. Subtopics are not presented.Conclusion is missing or disconnected from the topic.Writing lacks skill. Sources are not present.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting Evidence/Research
20 to >15.8 ptsMeets Expectations
Three or more appropriate sources are completely and eloquently integrated throughout the paper.At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials.Detailed, meaningful quotations and paraphrases aptly and accurately support the topic.
15.8 to >11.8 ptsApproaches Expectations
Fewer than three appropriate sources are used.At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials.Quotations and paraphrases are lacking or do not support several subtopics.
11.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Sources are missing.Paper lacks quotations and paraphrases.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA Formatting
10 to >7.9 ptsMeets Expectations
The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
7.9 to >5.9 ptsApproaches Expectations
The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed.
5.9 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page.Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.
10 pts
Total Points: 100

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now