Research a therapeutic use of DNA technology. This application may be actively i

Posted: January 1st, 2023

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Research a therapeutic use of DNA technology. This application may be actively in use, or still in development.
Write a paper addressing the following:
Introducing the technique. What is it? How was it developed? (Or how is it being developed?)
What is the value of this technique? (What “problems” is it used to solve?)
Summarize the protocol for its use.
Describe the mechanism behind this application. What is happening on the molecular level?
What are the pros and cons of using this technique?
Find an example of a scientific journal article, medical journal, forensics article or case study, or agricultural field study where this technique is being implemented or developed. Briefly, explain how it was used in the context of the paper.
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
Be 2-3 pages in length, not including your title/cover and reference pages.
Be formatted according to the CSU Global Writing CenterLinks to an external site.
Cite a minimum of three academic peer-reviewed scholarly sources to support your responses.
Rubric
BIO204 Mod 1 CT
BIO204 Mod 1 CT
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
10 to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
8 to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
6 to >4.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
4 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
10 to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
8 to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
6 to >4.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
4 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
5 to >4.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
4 to >3.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
3 to >2.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
2 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples
5 to >4.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
4 to >3.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
3 to >2.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
2 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
5 to >4.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
4 to >3.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
3 to >2.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
2 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
5 to >4.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.
4 to >3.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.
3 to >2.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.
2 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 40

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now