What would a subjective moral relativist say is the right approach to the dilemma?

Posted: June 7th, 2022

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

For this assignment propose a scenario where you or someone you know are confronted with a moral dilemma relating to cultural diversity and multiculturalism. It cannot be the same as what was covered in the week one discussion.
Cultural diversity refers to religious, sexual, racial, and other forms of social difference. A moral dilemma is a situation in which one must make a decision between two or more options such that the options involve seemingly ethical and/or unethical conduct. Address the following questions:
What was the situation? What did the dilemma involve?
What would a subjective moral relativist say is the right approach to the dilemma? Why would that kind of relativist say that?
What would a cultural relativist say is the right approach to the dilemma? Why would that kind of relativist say that? Is that approach correct?
What did you the person confronting the dilemma decide to do? What moral justification did they give? Is that approach morally correct?
Was there an objective moral truth (the objectively right thing to do) in this situation? Why or why not?
Remember, the dilemma should be detailed with descriiption and dialogue. Regard the questions as requirements. This is an essay, so rather than simply providing a list of brief answers to questions, provide an in-depth reflection regarding a difficult ethical situation..
Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 1.5-2 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)
Grading
This activity will be graded based on the Essay Grading Rubric.
Course Outcomes (CO): 1
Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
File Upload
Google Drive
Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded.
I agree to the tool’s End-User License Agreement.Links to an external site.
This assignment submission is my own, original work
Rubric
ETHC445 Week 1 Assignment Rubric – 50 pts.
ETHC445 Week 1 Assignment Rubric – 50 pts.
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Content
30 pts
Addresses all aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts.
25.5 pts
Addresses most aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, , and research regarding weekly concepts.
22.5 pts
Addresses some aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts.
18 pts
Minimally addresses the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts.
0 pts
No effort
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Professional Communication
10 pts
Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
8.5 pts
Presents information in an organized manner (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
7.5 pts
Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
6 pts
Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).
0 pts
No effort
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Source Integration
5 pts
Paper includes reference to 2 scholarly sources and properly integrates the sources.
3 pts
Paper includes reference to 2 scholarly sources but does not properly integrate the sources.
0 pts
Paper does not make reference to a scholarly sources.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format
5 pts
Paper meets all source requirements, and is properly formatted in APA style throughout (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.)
4 pts
Paper meets all source requirements, and is mostly properly formatted in APA style (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.)
3 pts
Paper meets all source requirements, and is somewhat properly formatted in APA style (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.)
2 pts
Paper fails to meet source requirements and/or is improperly formatted in APA style throughout
0 pts
No effort
5 pts
Total Points: 50

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now